|
|
| idea |
| |
| Replies: 0 |
| Views: 44 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| Let's start from the beginning: When your image is read off your sensor and processed by your camera, it is represented as a bunch of numbers. To store the file in a format |
|
|
|
| idea |
| |
| Replies: 0 |
| Views: 42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Let's start from the beginning: When your image is read off your sensor and processed by your camera, it is represented as a bunch of numbers. To store the file in a format |
|
|
|
| idea |
| |
| Replies: 0 |
| Views: 42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The longer answer: There seems to be something of a folklore about lossy compression that defies all common sense and reason. Some people seem to think that resaving an image |
|
|
|
| idea |
| |
| Replies: 0 |
| Views: 42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| lossless format such as TIFF will somehow improve the quality of the image. This couldn't be further from the truth or from the very meaning of lossless. |
|
|
|
| idea |
| |
| Replies: 0 |
| Views: 45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| you should just leave it in whatever format the camera produced. If you've made some changes and don't expect to do any further edits, you should save in whatever format |
|
|
|
| idea |
| |
| Replies: 0 |
| Views: 46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| formats supported by your image editor. (See also the discussion of JPEG vs. TIFF below.) If you aren't planning on changing the image at all. |
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
All times are GMT |
|
Forum: 
